Children learn the principles of going from ordinary to extraordinary

In my opinion, the three factors of family, IQ and lifelong learning do not affect the same kind of people, but people at different levels. We roughly divide people into four levels from low to high: What is logical thinking training 1200 questions pdf Baidu Netdisk The first level is \”defective people\”. This refers to people who are unable to live an ordinary life because of their major flaws. They may embark on a criminal path, may fall into poverty, may be withdrawn and disconnected from society. They are unhappy and need help from the government and society. The second level is \”ordinary people\”. Of course, everyone is extraordinary. “Ordinary” here means that life is normal. I am busy but also very happy. I have enjoyed the benefits of economic growth and have warm family ties. If everyone could live a normal life, society would actually be quite beautiful. The third level is the \”excellent\”. These people either have good academic performance or have a skill that exceeds the average level. They have higher education, higher positions and income than ordinary people. They are standard students in the school, good employees in the eyes of leaders, popular targets in the blind date market, and what parents call \”other people\’s children.\” The fourth level is \”Shi\”. Scholars were the lowest level of nobles and the top level of civilians in ancient China. The scholar is the leader or business backbone in the unit, and the scholar has influence on others. A scholar is the number one figure in society. Others know who he is, not just as a position or an employee. Scholars often have a skill that is outstanding and can rank high in their field or company. Scholars are thoughtful, independent, and able to make decisions. The difference between scholars and outstanding people is that scholars have subjective initiative and freedom. No matter how good a tool man is, he is just a tool man, and a scholar is not a tool man. This classification is general and not absolute. Some people may be deficient in one aspect, but are out-and-out taxis in another aspect. This classification considers not economic and social status, but the person\’s ability and knowledge. A person who owns many houses but has no ability is just an ordinary person, not an outstanding person. Best of all, people can move between levels. Family, IQ and lifelong learning determine the level a person belongs to. The main role of the family is to determine whether a person can reach the level of ordinary people and whether he will become a disabled person. People have high hopes for family education, including housing in a school district, helping with homework, attending tutoring classes, and hiring famous teachers. In fact, there is an upper limit to the influence of family on people. A child is like a growing tree: if you want to destroy the tree, it is very easy; but if you want the tree to grow outstandingly, that is not up to you. If parents abuse their children from an early age, do not provide adequate nutrition, or do not provide adequate learning environment protection, the child will most likely not grow up healthily. Originally, the child was a good child, but the family did not raise him well. Many studies have shown that if the family is a low-income family, the parents are not well-educated, or the parents do not have legitimate careers, and the family life is chaotic, the performance of the children will be lower than their intellectual potential when they grow up. But if the conditions of this family are already very good, the children can grow up healthily.If he grows up and gets a normal education, he can at least become an ordinary person. But can he become great? That has little to do with family environment and almost entirely depends on his own IQ. And IQ is almost something you are born with, and it is difficult to improve it the day after tomorrow. Then you say that family cultural inheritance, homework support, tutoring classes, and good schools are all useless? The function of those things is only to allow children to use their IQ, not to improve their IQ. If the conditions are too poor, the child\’s IQ will not be able to develop, just like a small tree that is malnourished and has no room to grow; but as long as certain conditions are met, the tree can grow fully, and no matter how good the conditions are, it will have little effect. IQ is a factor that determines large-scale effects, and excellence is a large-scale effect. But excellence, excellence, and becoming a \”scholar\” are small-scale phenomena. Whether ordinary people can get into a good university or find a good job is a large-scale effect, mainly a matter of IQ. But whether a person can rise to a leadership position, whether he can stand alone, whether he can occupy a unique position, whether he can change the world, is not a question of IQ. There is also an upper limit to the influence of IQ. This is just like family environment can only take you so far, IQ can only take you so far. What does it take to go from good to great? Based on my research results, I think there are two main points. First, you have to have inner drive. This time you are not fighting for external things such as parents, money or position. You have to have a lofty goal, find a field, find a mission, and be able to drive yourself. Second, you need to be able to understand and deal with complex problems. You can\’t be a screw this time. You have to get out of the process, get rid of knee-jerk reaction thinking, control your own thinking, have your own opinions and dare to make decisions. These two points cannot be provided by the family, genes cannot be pre-installed, and schools cannot teach them. They mainly rely on their own lifelong learning. What is lifelong learning? The first is to learn self-motivation and complex thinking. Lifelong learning is a necessary condition for becoming a scholar. A person who is driven by the outside world all day long and can only think simply, no matter how smart and hardworking he is, is just a \”slave\”. Of course, lifelong learning is not necessarily a sufficient condition for excellence. To achieve significant success, you still need a certain amount of opportunity, talent and luck. However, lifelong learning may allow people to transcend family background and genetic IQ, and directly jump from \”ordinary people\” or even \”disabled people\” to the level of \”gentlemen\”. Countless inspirational stories about rising from the bottom are about them. Some people grew up in broken or even toxic families, but they became gentle, elegant and majestic big shots; some people had mediocre qualifications and were slow to learn anything, but they became great masters. It is impossible that they do not have inner drive, that they have not honed complex thinking, and that they are not lifelong learners. It’s just that there are too few such people. What they are comparing is not talent, but structure, vision, mental strength, physical ability and execution ability. Does talent have any impact on lifelong learning? there must be. Some people are born curious about everything, and some people are born indifferent. But countless studies have proven that learning motivation can be trained. historySteven Kotler published a book in 2021 called \”Impossible Skills: An Introduction to Peak Performance\”, which lists methods to train learning motivation. It’s just that you have to train yourself, and you can’t be forced to train by others. It\’s almost a contradiction. If you want to forcefully train a person to love learning, then he is definitely not intrinsically driven. This is why \”cultural inheritance\” is so difficult, and why Ichiro Kishimi said in the book \”The Courage to Be Disliked\” that educating children requires separation of subjects: learning is the child\’s subject, not yours, you can lead a horse to it By the river, but in the end it is its own decision to drink water or not. All in all, if we accurately understand the meaning of heredity, environment and learning, then success depends on family, excellence depends on genetics, and excellence depends on learning. There are many excellent people in the world, but too few scholars. You can be an excellent person without lifelong learning, but you can only be a person who follows the crowd. Lifelong learning is our only hope to break the chains, and it must be our own business.